Suzanne Straw and Julie Nelson (NFER) and Bronwen Maxwell and Mike Coldwell (SIOE)
29 September 2022
Research report on the DfE website
Between September 2017 and May 2022, NFER undertook the evaluation of TLIF, a three-year funding programme which aimed to support projects offering high-quality continuing professional development (CPD) for teachers and school leaders in the areas and schools in England that needed it most. The overall aim was to improve the outcomes of children and young people, thereby making a significant contribution towards tackling social mobility. The evaluation focused on eight projects delivered by: Ambition Institute; EdisonLearning; Education Development Trust and Chartered College of Teaching; Geographical Association and Association for Science Education; Institute of Physics; Teacher Development Trust; Teach First and Tom Bennett Training.
- Evaluation of the TLIF: The Teach First Leading Together Project
- Evaluation of the TLIF: The Institute of Physics Future Physics Leaders project
- Evaluation of the TLIF: The Education Development Trust and Chartered College of Teaching Accelerate Project
- Evaluation of the TLIF: The Teacher Development Trust CPD Excellence Hubs Project
- Evaluation of the TLIF: Tom Bennett Training project
- Evaluation of the TLIF: The GA and ASE Critical Thinking for Achievement project
- Evaluation of the TLIF: The Ambition Institute’s Transforming Teaching Project
- Evaluation of the TLIF: EdisonLearning’s NAHT Aspire Project
- All projects met or almost met their school and participant recruitment targets. Recruitment was supported by providers’ use of existing school networks, understanding of schools’ needs, distinctive and flexible offers, effective targeting, and reputation and credibility.
- Most projects achieved high levels of participant satisfaction, and there was strong evidence that projects contributed to positive changes in individuals’ personal teaching and leadership practices. There was also moderate evidence that the projects impacted positively on whole-school teaching practices and culture change.
- At direct-participant level, most of the projects had a positive impact on retention. However, it was not possible to disentangle the effect of the programme from other non-observed systematic differences between participants and non-participants, so these results may be over-estimated. Although initially intended, pupil outcomes were not explored due to exams being cancelled during the pandemic.
- Features of effective provision included: an appropriate and skilled delivery team; tailoring; and being responsive to feedback. Audits, face-to-face coaching, mentoring and training/workshops with individual/groups of schools proved effective.
- Implementation of learning was supported by: structured in-school support; the incorporation of ‘plan-do-review’ processes; the use of practical, actionable approaches and resources introduced or practised during CPD; and the involvement of a number of people from the same school, thereby building capacity.
- There was evidence, across all projects, that participants had made potentially sustainable changes to their personal practices. However, at the department and/or school level, there were fewer examples.